Project Management for Collection of Sources-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theProject Management for Collection of Sources. Answer: Prioritization Process The project prioritization process helps in the formation of the structure for the carrying out of the activities in an organized fashion. The priority is set at first and then the process is carried out so that the outcome for the project can be achieved successfully (Shollo, Constantiou Kreiner, 2015). The use of the project prioritization process also helps in the ranking system of the various processes (Zahedi-Seresht et al., 2014). The order of execution of the various processes of the project is decided by the use of the method of project prioritization process. Rational Criteria The six criteria of project prioritization are as follows (Kerzner Kerzner, 2017)- Understanding the project: The proper understanding of what is required of the project is necessary for the achieving of the outcome of the task. Planning of project: The proper planning of the project is necessary for the carrying out of the task Collection of sources: The next criteria for the prioritization process involve the collection of the data and the collection of the important information in order to carry out the task. Ranking of processes: Based on the importance of the processes, these processes are ranked and the work flow of the project is carried out in accordance with the processes Execution of processes: After all the processes are carried out then the execution of the task is to be made Verification: The verification part involves the checking of the task. The whole task is checked and reviewed and in case of any failure or any problem the error is corrected and then the correct solution is provided. The Project and the solution The project is based on providing shelter to the homeless people coming from different background in Australia. For this two different solutions are proposed (Shadiev, Hwang Huang, 2015). Proper understanding and evaluation of both the solution is necessary in order to propose a particular solution (Ueda Maehira, 2015). The Priority list of both the project The list of priorities associated with project A are as follows- Construction of the 2000 housing units in state of Queensland Construction of Physical amenities Construction of roads, public school, hospital A solution to the homelessness in Australia The list of priorities associated with project B is as follows- Checking the issues such as depression, infectious diseases and so on associated with the homeless people. Eradication of problem of homelessness by pondering over the cures such as building of low budget homes. Creation of awareness among the individual for the serious topic of homelessness, drug addiction and so on Cultivation, farming and other labour skills to be taught to homeless people After evaluation of the prioritization list, it can be concluded that that project B is a feasible and more practical solution to the problem. Associated weightings Criteria Project A Weighing (On scale of 5) Construction of the 2000 housing units in state of Queensland 4.2 Construction of Physical amenities 3.8 Construction of roads, public school, hospital 3.5 Criteria Project b Weighing (On scale of 5) Checking the issues such as depression, infectious diseases and so on associated with the homeless people. 4.2 Eradication of problem of homelessness by pondering over the cures such as building of low budget homes. 4.3 Creation of awareness among the individual for the serious topic of homelessness, drug addiction and so on 4 Cultivation, farming and other labour skills to be taught to homeless people 4.5 Therefore, it is seen that it is more feasible to implement project B Process to Address Failure It is critical to address the project failure as the project is based on providing shelter to the homeless people. Two approaches or solution to the project is present, one of which is construction of 2000 housing units in the state of Queensland. The housing units will be specifically designed to cater for the social and cultural needs of indigenous Australians. The other solution is to use the farming land available in Australia which is not used till date for the use of the homeless people. Therefore it is a very critical decision that is to be made and process of addressing the failure can be implementation of the project after performing proper feasibility and risk analysis. The Project B is chosen and project A is eliminated from the consideration as project A tends to provide houses to the homeless people while project B will address the causes of homelessness and unemployment. Prioritization Matrix: Criteria of chosen solution Weight Score in project A (building of houses) Score of Project B (Using the cultivation lands) 1 Easy Resource availability 5 3 4 2 Provides solution to the identified problem 5 5 5 3 Associated risk 5 4 3 4 Cost of implementation 5 3 4 5 Time for execution 5 3 4 6 Complexity 5 4 5 7 Budget 5 3 4 8 Relocation Cost 5 4 4 9 Site availability 5 3 4 Total Score 32 37 The project B is chosen as it is more feasible to implement as the budget for project B is $33 million dollars while the cost of implementation of project A is nearly $8 billion. Prioritization Outcome The understanding of the project is the most important part of the project. This shows that the understanding of the project is the most important part for carrying out a task. If the requirement of the task is not properly understood then the problem may arise and the outcome of the project is not achieved. The ranking process has been stated as important next to the understanding of the task (Shadiev, Hwang Huang, 2015). The ranking of the task is important as the processes, which are important has to be decided. The work flow is decided on the basis of this parameter. If all the small processes are satisfied only then the task can be completed in a proper manner. The parameter of verification and planning of a project has been ranked third and fourth respectively as these parameters are next important (Reich, 2016).. The proper checking of the task is important after its completion and the planning is to be made before proceeding with the project as the proper planning needs to b e made to avoid any errors. From the above matrix, it can be concluded that it will be more feasible to implement the project B. The project criteria identified are based on the scope of the project and the associated weighing is given on basis of the identified criteria (Kerzner, 2017). The scoring of each criterion is based on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 represents higher complexity and 5 represents lower complexity. For example, in criteria number 4 that is based on cost of implementation, a score of 3 for project A and a score of 4 for project B indicates it will require more resource and money in implementing project A in comparison to the implementation of project B. Furthermore, it addresses the different causes of homelessness. Therefore it is concluded that out of the two proposed solutions, use of the cultivable land is more appropriate in providing shelter to the homeless people of Australia. References: Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Execution.Project Management Case Studies, 211-308. Kerzner, H., Kerzner, H. R. (2017).Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Reich, T. (2016). A Crossroads for Collection Development and Assessment, Its Fallout, and Unknowns: Where Do We Go From Here?. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M. (2015). A pilot study: Facilitating cross-cultural understanding with project-based collaborative learning in an online environment.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,31(2). Shollo, A., Constantiou, I., Kreiner, K. (2015). The interplay between evidence and judgment in the IT project prioritization process.The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,24(3), 171-188. Ueda, Y., Maehira, S. (2015). Verification test results of the wide-area control and operation system for distributed generation of renewable energy. InTelecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC), 2015 IEEE International(pp. 1-5). IEEE. Zahedi-Seresht, M., Akbarijokar, M., Khosravi, S., Afshari, H. (2014). Construction project success ranking through the data envelopment analysis.Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science,2014, 1-13.